Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
578-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

578-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971388 50.867030)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971303 50.867021,-0.971307 50.867038,-0.971319 50.867053,-0.971337 50.867065,-0.971361 50.867073,-0.971387 50.867076,-0.971413 50.867073,-0.971437 50.867066,-0.971456 50.867054,-0.971469 50.867039,-0.971473 50.867023,-0.971470 50.867006,-0.971458 50.866991,-0.971439 50.866979,-0.971416 50.866971,-0.971389 50.866968,-0.971363 50.866970,-0.971339 50.866978,-0.971320 50.866989,-0.971307 50.867004,-0.971303 50.867021)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL